tricky-pockets:

tricky-pockets:

probablyday:

I don’t know that the canonical Bertie Wooster could be called “progressive” (or “politically engaged” or “aware of anything that’s going on outside of his immediate sphere of acquaintances with funny nicknames”) but you can’t argue he wouldn’t support gay marriage. Bertie Wooster neither likes nor understands straight marriage, but he fights for his friends who inexplicably want to do that.

And if you change your pronouns, Bertie Wooster will never fuck them up because he barely has room in his brain for one set of them per person. As soon as you tell him, the old ones just evaporate. He might ask Jeeves about it later, but it’d be to the tune of “I say, Jeeves, why didn’t you tell me that Bingo was a woman this whole time? I’ve been calling her a bloke for years; she must think I’m a perfect ass.”

To be clear, he doesn’t understand that she transitioned. He thinks that she’s always been a lady. He’d try to explain it to someone and accidentally be the most supportive ally.

an aunt, probably: What’s all this nonsense about young Bingo, then? I hear he’s gotten it into his head that he’s a woman. Going about in dresses and such.

Bertie: Oh, I was confused as well, but it turned out to be rather a large misunderstanding. Bingo is a woman, always has been.

Aunt: That can’t be right, Bertie; he was at Eton with you, you absolute chump.

Bertie: Well, yes. Some sort of scholarship program, perhaps? I’m fuzzy on the details. But she’s very definitely a woman. She told me so herself, and I daresay she would know. Bit embarrassing for all of us, really; we mistook her for a bloke for years, the poor girl. She must have been too polite to say anything about it.

Aunt: But he’s gone his whole life up until last week looking like a man! If he were a woman, why would he not present himself as such?

Bertie: There was a dress code. I don’t know how many times I was told off for a scruffy tie.

Aunt: I don’t mean at school, you dunce. Even if - and it’s still nonsense, mind you - even if I were to accept that Eton somehow permitted this ridiculous state of affairs, what about afterwards?

Bertie: Oh, I haven’t the foggiest. I’ve long since given up on explaining the fairer sex, as well you know.

Aunt: Bertram, he was christened ‘Richard’.

Bertie: Yes, bit of an odd choice on her parents’ part. I mean, you don’t see many girls named Richard, what? I say, do you suppose that’s why she goes by 'Bingo’? If I were a lady saddled with Bingo’s Christian name, I should likely choose something else too.

Aunt: Have you spoken to Jeeves about all this?

Bertie: Naturally.

Aunt: And? What is his evaluation?

Bertie: He says that when a young lady asserts that she is, in fact, a lady, one ought to take her word for it.

Bertie: Very sensible, I thought. One can always trust Jeeves in these matters.

Bertie: Say, when’s lunch?

(via dduane)

foone:

animentality:

image

BTW, just to make sure everyone knows, this isn’t just some internet rando commenting on her observations on the internet.

They are an Assistant Professor of Media Industries at New York University and literally just finished writing The Apple II Age: How the Computer Became Personal, a book on the history of the computer industry in the 70s.


image

This tweet isn’t just an observation, it’s the result of years of research and study. And it’s absolutely true.

(via traycakes)

gemsandjunk:

gemsandjunk:

Everyone is nostalgic and no one is sincere. Do you get the idea

Reboots made by people that don’t respect what they’re rebooting. Punching down before buzz feed listicles punch first. Isn’t it weird that the princess married the prince after just meeting him? Isn’t it cringe that magic exists? Irony poisoning of childhood classics. Well that just happened humour. Say something true and beautiful or I will start throwing rocks

(via thydungeonguy)

thedialup:

me when the disorder that I have that is literally a disability makes me unable to do certain things

image

(via tiredqueerandwitchy)

itsmedemibones:

unashamedly-enthusiastic:

elliot-amy:

chaotic muppets interview

These are the words of puppeteers who should not be up this early

image

(via punkitt-is-here)

bethanythemartian:

from-your-ashes:

pixelsmasher:

thebindingbird:

HORF

Oh my fucking ribs.

this is clearly a case of a dog being reincarnated in the wrong body

I’ve seen this post dozens of times and yet I always stop to read it again and again because “dead HORF” never fails to make me laugh

Tango abides, man.

(via punkitt-is-here)

immorallyambiguous asked:

Will you read this? Eh, perhaps. You're a busy man with quite a lot of asks. But there is a very human part of me that wants to say my piece because I owe you quite a bit of thanks.

And I shall express this thanks with a story of my first words.

When I was 2, approaching 3, years old my parents were worried I'd never speak. The child therapist we went to - quite an old bat if you ask me, considering the stories I've heard, but what do I know I was 2 - had told them to ever give up hope of hearing my voice.

On the way back from the appointment, my Godmother - the driver of the car used to take me to the doctor - stopped by a small bookshop and took me inside so my mother could weep appropriately out of line of her child. We went inside and she told me to look around for a book for myself. She knew I loved books - wasn't sure if I was reading them or not, but knew that I at least liked looking at them and wanted to keep me occupied.

I apparently stumbled around for a while, grabbed one small book off the shelf and plopped my little arse right down and started flipping through. About fifteen minutes go by - and my mother has thoroughly cried herself dry - and my Godmother comes up to me and scoops me up with the book.

I - being the obstinate two year old that I am - refuse to let go of said book and it's only about 50 American cents so she simply buys me the book.

For the next few weeks I only carry around the book. I do not touch any of my other toys or stuffed animals, only the very small picture book. I sleep with it under my pillow, carry it around happily, flip through it every so often.

And then one unassuming day, at the dinner table - with a set of non-prepared parents - boldly yelled out my first words ever: Blueberry Girl.

Now, I'm sure you've figured out at this point of the story that the book my little self was holding was none other than your boo Blueberry Girl - and this is where my thanks comes. I have spent the last sixteen or so years since first acquiring it repeating the words to myself, asking Ladies of Light and Ladies of Darkness and Ladies of Never-You-Mind to watch over me if they could spare moments of their time. I repeat them whenever I have a difficult test, and even in the few moments right before my graduation speech of high school.

So thank you for the words that touched my little soul and stuck with me till now.

neil-gaiman:

You are so very, very welcome.

cryscal:

mostlysignssomeportents:

How Google’s trial secrecy lets it control the coverage

image

I’m coming to Minneapolis! Oct 15: Presenting The Internet Con at Moon Palace Books. Oct 16: Keynoting the 26th ACM Conference On Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.

image

“Corporate crime” is practically an oxymoron in America. While it’s true that the single most consequential and profligate theft in America is wage theft, its mechanisms are so obscure and, well, dull that it’s easy to sell us on the false impression that the real problem is shoplifting:

https://newrepublic.com/post/175343/wage-theft-versus-shoplifting-crime

Corporate crime is often hidden behind Dana Clare’s Shield Of Boringness, cloaked in euphemisms like “risk and compliance” or that old favorite, “white collar crime”:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/12/07/solar-panel-for-a-sex-machine/#a-single-proposition

And corporate crime has a kind of performative complexity. The crimes come to us wreathed in specialized jargon and technical terminology that make them hard to discern. Which is wild, because corporate crimes occur on a scale that other crimes – even those committed by organized crime – can’t hope to match:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/12/no-criminals-no-crimes/#get-out-of-jail-free-card

But anything that can’t go on forever eventually stops. After decades of official tolerance (and even encouragement), corporate criminals are finally in the crosshairs of federal enforcers. Take National Labor Relations Board general counsel Jennifer Abruzzo’s ruling in Cemex: when a company takes an illegal action to affect the outcome of a union election, the consequence is now automatic recognition of the union:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/06/goons-ginks-and-company-finks/#if-blood-be-the-price-of-your-cursed-wealth

That’s a huge deal. Before, a boss could fire union organizers and intimidate workers, scuttle the union election, and then, months or years later, pay a fine and some back-wages…and the union would be smashed.

Keep reading

Louder on this one:

Big companies aren’t just too big to fail and too big to jail – they’re also too big for peaceful coexistence with a society of laws.

The secrecy corporate leaders insist on to conceal proprietary information is just as easily used to conceal crime and abuse.

oldshowbiz:

image

Another woke comedian opposed to free speech…

(via weirdlookindog)